Is Dawn of the Dead (2004) Scary? Unpacking the Horror of Zack Snyder's Zombie Remake

Poster image for Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead (2004) featuring a chaotic mall scene with fast, aggressive zombies and dark, gritty lighting that underscores the film’s intense, visceral horror.

Yes, Zack Snyder’s Dawn of the Dead (2004) is widely considered very scary, primarily due to its intense action, relentless pace, graphic gore, and terrifyingly fast, aggressive zombies.¹ Unlike the slower, satirical 1978 original, this remake aims directly for visceral horror, shock value, and sustained tension, making it a frightening experience for many viewers.¹ The filmmakers deliberately shifted the focus from the social commentary prevalent in George A. Romero’s work towards creating an extreme horror film designed to terrify its audience.¹

What Makes Dawn of the Dead (2004) Frightening?

Zack Snyder’s directorial debut did not simply rehash Romero’s classic; it re-envisioned the zombie apocalypse for a new generation, employing specific techniques and emphasizing certain horror elements to maximize fear and intensity.⁴ Several key factors contribute to its reputation as a genuinely scary film.

The Dawn of Fast Zombies: Impact on Intensity and Fear

Perhaps the most significant departure from Romero’s vision, and a primary source of the remake’s terror, is the nature of its zombies. These are not the slow, shambling ghouls of traditional zombie lore. Inspired partly by the “infected” in 28 Days Later (released two years prior), Snyder’s zombies run “like hell,” possess considerable strength, and exhibit extreme aggression, snarling and roaring as they relentlessly pursue their victims.¹ This fundamental change drastically alters the dynamic of the horror. The threat is immediate, overwhelming, and seemingly inescapable, forcing characters into frantic, reactive survival rather than strategic defense against a slowly encroaching horde.³

These zombies are active predators, capable of keeping pace with fleeing vehicles and punching through windshields.⁶ Their visual design adds another layer of horror, with makeup effects depicting a range from the freshly turned – appearing like blood-drenched, crazed individuals with horrific wounds – to the clearly decaying, emphasizing the gruesome reality of the transformation.¹ The sheer speed and ferocity of these creatures, often appearing in overwhelming numbers, create a constant state of panic and high-stakes intensity.¹

The introduction of these fast zombies, alongside 28 Days Later, is credited with revitalizing the zombie genre in the early 2000s, making zombies “hip” again but also genuinely terrifying for audiences accustomed to slower threats.⁹ While technically The Return of the Living Dead (1985) featured running zombies earlier, the one-two punch of 28 Days Later and Dawn of the Dead (2004) brought this terrifying concept into the mainstream, unlocking new phobias for many viewers.⁹ The choice to use fast zombies was not merely cosmetic; it drove the film’s shift towards action-horror, dictating a faster pace and a focus on visceral, immediate scares over the allegorical dread of the original.¹

A Symphony of Gore and Visceral Horror

Dawn of the Dead (2004) does not shy away from graphic depictions of violence. It earned its R rating for “Pervasive Strong Horror Violence and Gore”.¹³ The film is described by viewers and critics as “massively gory,” featuring numerous “gruesome, bloody deaths” for both humans and zombies.¹ Blood sprays liberally during intense confrontations involving guns, chainsaws, and other implements, accompanied by disturbing imagery that aims to shock and repel.¹

The practical makeup and special effects were noted strengths, contributing to the realism of the gore.¹³ While some found the gore effectively grotesque and part of the film’s bloody entertainment value ¹⁵, others felt it was excessive or used to compensate for a perceived lack of substance compared to the original.⁴ Regardless of interpretation, the high level of graphic violence is undeniable and serves as a primary tool in the film’s horror arsenal. This focus on visceral impact aligns perfectly with the action-horror approach, delivering immediate shocks and reinforcing the brutal reality of this particular apocalypse.¹ The sheer brutality on display constantly reminds the audience of the stakes, contributing significantly to the unsettling atmosphere and pervasive sense of danger.¹

Relentless Pace and Unsettling Atmosphere

Complementing the fast zombies and graphic gore is the film’s relentless pacing. It “starts off with a big scare and almost doesn’t let up till the end”.¹ This rapid tempo keeps the audience on edge, mirroring the characters’ constant struggle for survival and leaving little room for respite or a feeling of safety.¹ The editing is often described as sharp and effective in maintaining this momentum.⁹

The overall tone is intentionally “dark and grim,” creating an atmosphere of hopelessness and futility that permeates the narrative.¹ Cinematographer Matthew F. Leonetti employed specific visual techniques to enhance this mood, including a rich, often desaturated color palette (deep greens and blues), a sometimes grainy, handheld camera style (especially in outdoor chaos scenes) contributing to disorientation, and a slightly overexposed look giving the film a unique, harsh aesthetic.¹ The mall itself, often depicted with stark fluorescent lighting or bathed in bile-green shadows, feels less like a refuge and more like a tomb, contrasting sharply with the almost whimsical portrayal in Romero’s original.¹⁸

This combination of breakneck speed and oppressive atmosphere aims for sustained adrenaline and dread.³ The music score by Tyler Bates, featuring ominous notes and sometimes juxtaposed with ironically upbeat licensed tracks (like Richard Cheese’s lounge cover of “Down With the Sickness” during a montage), further amplifies the tension and unsettling mood.⁶ The result is a film that prioritizes urgency and chaos, seeking to overwhelm the viewer’s senses.²⁴

Jump Scares and Shock Value (Including the Zombie Baby)

Dawn of the Dead (2004) utilizes jump scares to punctuate its relentless tension. While some viewers find them effective, leading to genuine frights ²⁵, others note a potential over-reliance on them, sometimes considering them a “lower form” of horror compared to sustained atmospheric dread.⁶

Beyond traditional jump scares, the film employs moments of extreme shock value designed to disturb and transgress boundaries. The most infamous example is the zombie baby sequence.¹⁸ The anticipation builds from the moment the pregnant Luda (Inna Korobkina) is revealed to be infected, leading to a shocking and brutally dispatched reveal that pushes horror conventions.⁶ Other shocking moments include the sudden, violent transformations of characters like Luis (Louis Ferreira) ¹ and the abrupt, often unexpected deaths of survivors, reinforcing the idea that no one is safe.³

These elements align with the film’s goal of delivering potent, immediate horror. While successful in eliciting visceral reactions, the emphasis on shock and jump scares further cements the film’s identity as an action-horror spectacle rather than a piece of slow-burn psychological terror.⁶ The zombie baby, in particular, demonstrates a willingness to confront taboos for maximum impact, a hallmark of the film’s aggressive approach to scaring its audience.

The Terrifying Opening Sequence: A Masterclass in Chaos

Widely regarded as one of the most effective openings in modern horror history, the first 10-15 minutes of Dawn of the Dead (2004) are a brutal and efficient exercise in establishing tone and terror.²⁴ The sequence masterfully contrasts mundane normalcy with sudden, apocalyptic violence. It begins quietly, following nurse Ana (Sarah Polley) finishing a long shift and returning to her seemingly perfect suburban home.²² This initial calm, underscored by the neighborhood’s almost unnaturally clean and saturated look, creates a false sense of security that is violently shattered.²⁶

The horror erupts without warning as a neighbor’s infected child attacks Ana’s husband, who quickly dies and reanimates to attack her.²⁴ The speed and brutality are shocking, immediately conveying the nature of the threat and the impossibility of relying on old rules or emotional attachments.²⁶ Ana’s escape through the neighborhood reveals widespread chaos – explosions, panicked neighbors turning on each other, and relentless pursuit by the running dead.²⁴ The use of handheld camerawork enhances the feeling of disorientation and panic.²

This visceral pre-credits sequence gives way to an equally impactful opening credits montage. Set to the chillingly prophetic Johnny Cash song “The Man Comes Around,” it intercuts staged scenes of zombie carnage with real archival footage of riots, disasters, and societal breakdown.²⁶ This blurring of fiction and reality creates a deeply unsettling effect, grounding the fantastical horror in recognizable chaos and suggesting the fragility of civilization.²⁶ The sequence functions as a powerful overture, instantly immersing the audience in the film’s grim reality, establishing the stakes, and priming them for the relentless horror to follow.³ It perfectly encapsulates the film’s approach: fast, brutal, chaotic, and prioritizing immediate, visceral impact.

How Scary is Dawn of the Dead (2004) Compared to Other Zombie Films?

Understanding the scariness of Snyder’s Dawn of the Dead involves comparing it to its influential predecessor and contemporary films that shaped the modern zombie landscape.

Versus the Original (1978): Action-Horror vs. Satire

The 2004 remake is fundamentally different from George A. Romero’s 1978 original in its approach to horror. The most obvious difference lies in the zombies: Snyder’s are fast, athletic predators, while Romero’s are slow, shambling embodiments of dread.⁷ This change dictates vastly different pacing and tones. The remake is an action-horror film, prioritizing speed, graphic gore, jump scares, and relentless intensity.¹ The original, while containing gore groundbreaking for its time, operates at a slower pace, building atmospheric dread and focusing on psychological horror and sharp social commentary, particularly on consumerism.¹

Snyder and writer James Gunn deliberately stripped away much of the satire, aiming for a “straight horror” experience or a “re-envisioning” for modern sensibilities.⁴ While the remake is often considered more viscerally frightening due to its immediate threats and shocking violence ³, the original is frequently lauded for its intelligence, thematic depth, enduring allegorical power, and the likability of its characters.⁹ Fan opinions are divided, with some seeing the remake as a worthy update or even superior in execution ⁵, while others, including Romero himself ⁴, found it shallow or disrespectful to the original’s legacy.¹⁰ Ultimately, “scary” manifests differently in each film: the remake offers adrenaline-fueled terror, while the original provides a creeping, thoughtful dread.

Versus 28 Days Later: Rage Virus vs. Running Dead

Released just two years prior, Danny Boyle’s 28 Days Later significantly impacted the genre and clearly influenced Snyder’s Dawn.¹ Both films feature fast, aggressive antagonists (though 28 Days Later‘s are technically living humans infected with a “rage virus,” not undead zombies) and are credited with revitalizing horror by injecting new levels of intensity.⁶

Despite similarities in speed and impact, their styles differ. 28 Days Later is often described as bleaker, grittier, and more atmospheric.³³ It uses intense bursts of brutal violence but also incorporates quiet moments of dread and focuses heavily on psychological breakdown and the darkness of human survivors.⁶ Snyder’s Dawn, by contrast, is generally viewed as more of a relentless action spectacle – a “fun carnival ride” packed with gore and thrills, potentially less focused on deep character arcs or overarching themes but perhaps more conventionally entertaining or rewatchable for some.³³ 28 Days Later often derives its scares from psychological tension and its stark portrayal of societal collapse, while Dawn‘s horror is more rooted in its explosive action sequences and visceral shocks.³³

Comparison of Horror Elements

The distinct approaches of these influential films can be summarized:

Feature	Dawn of the Dead (1978)	Dawn of the Dead (2004)	28 Days Later (2002)
Antagonist	Slow Zombies (Undead)	Fast Zombies (Undead)	Fast Infected (Living, Rage Virus)
Pace	Slow, Deliberate	Fast, Relentless	Variable; Intense Bursts, Quiet Dread
Tone	Satirical, Bleak, Psychological	Action-Horror, Grim, Visceral	Bleak, Gritty, Psychological, Tense
Gore Level	High (for its time), Practical	Very High, Graphic	High, Brutal but Less Constant
Primary Scares	Dread, Social Commentary, Isolation	Shock, Gore, Action, Jump Scares	Atmosphere, Tension, Human Brutality
Focus	Consumerism, Human Nature	Survival Action, Immediate Threat	Societal Collapse, Human Response

Memorable Moments That Amplify the Fear

Beyond the overall style, specific scenes in Dawn of the Dead (2004) stand out for their contribution to the film’s frightening reputation:

Andy’s Plight: The survivors’ interactions with Andy (Bruce Bohne), the stranded gun store owner across the street, provide moments of dark humor, tension, and ultimately, tragedy. Communicating via whiteboards, his lonely struggle against the undead, eventual infection, and ambiguous final message create a memorable and unsettling subplot.²² The script confirms he had turned before writing his last, blood-smeared message, adding a layer of chilling implication about lingering consciousness or instinct.³⁵
The Escape: The climactic escape attempt using heavily reinforced shuttle buses is a sequence of pure chaos and desperation. The overwhelming zombie hordes swarming the vehicles, the close calls, and the necessary sacrifices, particularly CJ’s (Michael Kelly) final act to save the others, are intense and harrowing.¹⁶
Luda and the Baby: As mentioned, the storyline involving Andre’s (Mekhi Phifer) pregnant wife Luda becoming infected leads to one of the film’s most shocking and taboo-breaking moments – the birth and immediate dispatch (off-screen) of a zombie baby.¹²
The Ending: The theatrical cut ends with the core survivors reaching the mall’s parking garage and making a plan. However, the found-footage sequence during the end credits depicts the smaller group reaching an island, only to be swarmed by zombies as the camera drops. This bleak, ambiguous ending cemented the film’s hopeless tone for many viewers, leaving a lasting sense of futility.⁷
Intense Encounters: Numerous other scenes feature high tension and visceral scares, such as the initial exploration of the darkened mall basement ³⁶, the first encounters with zombies trying to break into the mall ¹, the tense standoff with the initial security guards ³⁶, and the horrifying discovery of Frank’s (Matt Frewer) bite and the subsequent debate about his fate.¹

These moments often blend graphic violence with emotional distress – the loss of loved ones, the breakdown of trust, and the grim choices required for survival. Quotes like the Televangelist’s ominous warning, “When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth” ¹⁶, or Kenneth’s (Ving Rhames) desperate command during the escape, “They’re trying to turn us over! Hit them with the saw!” ¹⁶, capture the apocalyptic dread and chaotic violence that define the film’s scary identity.

Production and Reception: Contextualizing the Scares

Understanding the context of the film’s creation helps explain its specific brand of horror. Dawn of the Dead marked the feature directorial debut of Zack Snyder, working from a screenplay by James Gunn (who had previously written Scooby-Doo).⁴ Producers Eric Newman and Marc Abraham aimed to create a “re-envisioning” rather than a direct copy, intending to reinvigorate the genre for modern audiences while respecting the original.⁴ Gunn’s script focused on action and character dynamics within the mall siege premise, with uncredited rewrites by Michael Tolkin and Scott Frank adding character depth and larger action scenes, respectively.⁴ The goal was explicitly to make a straight, intense horror film grounded in a sense of reality, despite the fantastical premise.⁴

The ensemble cast included Sarah Polley, Ving Rhames (who actively sought a role), Jake Weber, and Mekhi Phifer, whose performances were generally praised even by critics who disliked other aspects.³ The film received generally positive, though sometimes mixed, reviews upon its March 2004 release.⁴ Critics often acknowledged its effectiveness in delivering scares, intense action, and strong production values, seeing it as an improvement in those areas over the original.³ However, criticism frequently centered on its perceived lack of character development, excessive gore, and indifference to the social commentary that defined Romero’s film.⁴

Despite Romero’s noted distaste ⁴ and some purist backlash ³¹, the film was a commercial success, grossing over $102 million worldwide on a $26 million budget.⁴ Audience scores on platforms like Metacritic (7.3 user score) and Rotten Tomatoes (75% verified audience score, though sources vary slightly) indicate a generally favorable reception from viewers.¹⁵ Retrospectively, it’s often cited as one of the better horror remakes of its era and considered by some to be Snyder’s best film.⁴ This reception suggests that the filmmakers’ intention – to deliver a modern, high-intensity action-horror experience – resonated strongly with audiences seeking thrills and visceral scares, even if it meant sacrificing some of the original’s thematic weight.

Conclusion: So, Just How Scary is Dawn of the Dead (2004)?

Yes, Dawn of the Dead (2004) stands as a very scary film, particularly for audiences seeking intense, action-driven, visceral horror. Its frightening reputation is built on several key elements: the terrifying speed, strength, and aggression of its running zombies, which create a sense of immediate and overwhelming threat; its relentless, breakneck pacing that offers little respite; its high level of graphic gore and shocking moments, including the infamous zombie baby and the brutal opening sequence; and its overall grim, high-stakes atmosphere underscored by a bleak ending.

It achieves its scares through a fundamentally different approach than its 1978 namesake, trading slow-burn dread and social satire for adrenaline-fueled chaos and visceral impact. While the subjectivity of fear means not everyone will find it equally terrifying, especially those preferring psychological horror or who find the action/gore overshadows substance, the film masterfully employs modern action-horror techniques. It delivers a potent, shocking, and undeniably frightening experience that successfully revitalized the zombie genre for a 21st-century audience and remains a benchmark for intense zombie horror.

Whether it’s the scariest zombie film is debatable, but its impact is undeniable. What moments from Dawn of the Dead (2004) still haunt you?

Works cited

Dawn of the … – Cody’s Film, TV, and Video Game Blog: Zombie Flicks, accessed April 11, 2025, http://codysfilmandtvblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/zombie-flicks-dawn-of-dead-2004.html
Dawn of the Dead (2004) – User reviews – IMDb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/reviews/
Review of Dawn of the Dead – IGN, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.ign.com/articles/2004/03/18/review-of-dawn-of-the-dead
Dawn of the Dead (2004 film) – Wikipedia, accessed April 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_of_the_Dead_(2004_film)
Dawn Of The Dead Is A Remake Done Right – FILMHOUNDS Magazine, accessed April 11, 2025, https://filmhounds.co.uk/2024/03/dawn-of-the-dead-is-a-remake-done-right/
Dawn of the Dead (2004) – Life Vs Film, accessed April 11, 2025, https://lifevsfilm.com/2014/06/21/dawn-of-the-dead-2004/
Dawn of the Dead: Comparing George A. Romero’s 1978 Zombie Movie to Zack Snyder’s 2004 Horror Remake – MovieWeb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://movieweb.com/dawn-of-the-dead-remake-vs-original/
Dawn of the Dead (2004) | There Goes the Neighborhood – YouTube, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq-oVyxJJUs
Dawn of the dead(2004) – can someone explain why is the movie so highly praised?, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/1fgp09h/dawn_of_the_dead2004_can_someone_explain_why_is/
Dawn of the Dead 2004 vs Dawn of the Dead 1978 – horror – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/18wrk2c/dawn_of_the_dead_2004_vs_dawn_of_the_dead_1978/
Dawn of the Dead (2004) – FAQ – IMDb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/faq/
‘Dawn of the Dead’ (1978) vs. ‘Dawn of the Dead’ (2004) | Horror – Vocal Media, accessed April 11, 2025, https://vocal.media/horror/dawn-of-the-dead-1978-vs-dawn-of-the-dead-2004
Dawn of the Dead (2004) – True Myth Media, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.truemythmedia.com/true-myth-media/reviews/dawnofthedead2004
Dawn of the Dead (2004) – IMDb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/
Dawn of the Dead Reviews – Metacritic, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.metacritic.com/movie/dawn-of-the-dead/
Dawn of the Dead (2004 film) – Wikiquote, accessed April 11, 2025, https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Dawn_of_the_Dead_(2004_film)
Quotes – Dawn of the Dead (2004) – IMDb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0363547/quotes/
Throwback Review #3: Dawn of the Dead (2004) | Many Strange Things – WordPress.com, accessed April 11, 2025, https://manystrangethings.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/throwback-review-3-dawn-of-the-dead-2004/
Dawn of the Dead user reviews – Metacritic, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.metacritic.com/movie/dawn-of-the-dead/user-reviews/
Dawn of the dead (2004) : r/horror – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/152m2c3/dawn_of_the_dead_2004/
Zack Snyder’s ‘Dawn of the Dead’ is Better As A Sequel Than A Remake – Dread Central, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.dreadcentral.com/editorials/515536/zack-snyders-dawn-of-the-dead-is-better-as-a-sequel-than-a-remake/
Zack Snyder: Dawn of the Dead (2004) – 3 Brothers Film, accessed April 11, 2025, https://3brothersfilm.com/blog/2021/3/18/zack-snyder-dawn-of-the-dead-2004
Dawn of the Dead (2004) /R/HORROR Official Discussion – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/37kqf6/dawn_of_the_dead_2004_rhorror_official_discussion/
The opening scene of Dawn Of The Dead (2004) still holds up as one of the most terrifying things I’ve ever seen. : r/horror – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/v5882k/the_opening_scene_of_dawn_of_the_dead_2004_still/
Dawn of the Dead (2004) is one of my favorites, simply for the character dynamics – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/1gkwc1r/dawn_of_the_dead_2004_is_one_of_my_favorites/
Zack Snyder’s Dawn Of The Dead Has One Of The Greatest …, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.gamespot.com/articles/zack-snyders-dawn-of-the-dead-has-one-of-the-greatest-openings-in-horror-history/1100-6521926/
Dawn of the dead title sequence analysis | PPT – SlideShare, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/dawn-of-the-dead-title-sequence-analysis/14736641
The Dawn of the Dead (2004) Opening Credits is one of the scariest openings I’ve ever seen : r/horror – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/13v5alp/the_dawn_of_the_dead_2004_opening_credits_is_one/
When There’s No More Room In Hell: An Analysis of George Romero’s “Dawn of the Dead”, accessed April 11, 2025, https://lewislitjournal.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/in-which-i-write-about-my-favorite-films-a-look-at-george-romeros-dawn-of-the-dead/
Dawn of the Dead (1978) vs Dawn of the Dead (2004) : r/movies – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/3ix8l5/dawn_of_the_dead_1978_vs_dawn_of_the_dead_2004/
Simon Pegg Slams Zack Snyder for ‘Disrespecting’ George A.Romero with Dawn of the Dead Remake – MovieWeb, accessed April 11, 2025, https://movieweb.com/simon-pegg-dawn-of-the-dead-disrespecting-george-romero/
Shaun, Dawn, and the 2004 resurrection of the zombie movie – AV Club, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.avclub.com/2004-zombie-movie-rebirth-shaun-of-the-dead-dawn-edgar-wright-zack-snyder
28 Days Later vs Dawn of the Dead(2004) : r/horror – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/horror/comments/13ce71c/28_days_later_vs_dawn_of_the_dead2004/
28 Days Later… vs. Dawn of the Dead (2004)? : r/HorrorMovies – Reddit, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HorrorMovies/comments/18ecovk/28_days_later_vs_dawn_of_the_dead_2004/
In Dawn of the Dead (2004) how do we account for the behaviour of Andy, the gunshop owner? – Sci-Fi Stack Exchange., accessed April 11, 2025, https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/121977/in-dawn-of-the-dead-2004-how-do-we-account-for-the-behaviour-of-andy-the-guns
Halloween Horror Overload! Day Two – Dawn of the Dead (2004) | Cinephile Sandra, accessed April 11, 2025, https://cinephilesandra.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/halloween-horror-overload-day-two-dawn-of-the-dead-2004/
‘One of My Beloved Films’: Zack Snyder Addresses Dawn of the Dead’s 20th Anniversary, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.cbr.com/zack-snyder-dawn-of-the-dead-20th-anniversary/
Dawn Of The Dead Cast: What The Actors Are Doing Now | Cinemablend, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2571647/dawn-of-the-dead-cast-what-the-actors-are-doing-now
Detail View – Mekhi Phifer – Actor – 11 Movies – davegott.com, accessed April 11, 2025, https://www.davegott.com/films/actor/mekhi_phifer/index2.html

Is Dawn of the Dead (2004) Scary? Unpacking the Horror of Zack Snyder’s Zombie Remake